ENGL 372: Advanced Composition, Summer 2020
Tuesday, June 23, 2020
Cara's Final Reflection
Final Reflection: Confessions of an Angry Feminist
Another thing I've realized through my research into angry feminism is that there are so many different types and sub-genres of feminism! I have been openly and actively a feminist for about 6 years now and I knew about some of the different types of feminism, but I had no idea that there were so many. Further, my research made me realize that my feminist views fall under what some people even consider radical feminism! Now I know why my conservative British grandmother always gets so upset about my Facebook page! haha I've never really considered myself a radical feminist. I identify as an intersectional and a cultural feminist. I have just learned, over time, from research done on my own and from a lot of my studies in the English department at Shepherd, that there is a hierarchical power structure of rich white men who have made the rules for our society, otherwise known as the patriarchy. The patriarchy's main goal is to keep their status which often means the oppression of those viewed as "other" which includes women, BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People Of Colour), LGBTQ+ people, and disabled people. Apparently, this is a tenet of "radical feminism" to some folx. I don't buy into that either though, because I think that term "radical feminism", like the term "angry feminist" is "a convention, a plot trick, a setup, a narrative structure, a character type. Its incessant repetition constitutes part of a cultural training program that makes antifeminism and misogyny a routine element in everyday speech and written argument” (Tomlinson 1).
But nonetheless, here's a pretty good video about the difference between real "radical feminism" and the idea of the patriarchy which I will definitely attest is a real concept that has affected my life and the lives of all of the women I know. I have also included a second video that includes a more modern view of patriarchy as a cultural structure, its social implications, and how the patriarchy is actually harmful for men and non-binary/genderfluid people, as well as women. I hope that my feminist arguments throughout this class have been somewhat educational and/or interesting to you, or that one or both of these videos clear up some of the more mystifying parts of feminism for those who don't know much about it.
I will say, I think I will miss writing these blog entries. I've gotten a lot of really good ideas for writing from posts I've written. Perhaps I should start a blog of my own!
Anyway, it's been a pleasure to be in class with you all no matter what your beliefs are. I've really enjoyed seeing all of you grow as the class progressed, and seeing this blog become more active and interesting (in every sense of the word) over time. We've all come a long way since the start of class, I think!
Enjoy the videos! (I sincerely hope you will take the time to watch them).
Chandler's Final Reflection
This class has truly broadened my worldview and taught me so much about a topic I had barely any prior knowledge of. I never paid much attention to comedy growing up, so most of the women we read/watched I had never seen or heard of. I thought I was somewhat familiar with the philosophy/ideology of feminism, but taking this class taught me that I really did not have much of a clue.
One of the first things we read was Frances Gray’s piece, Women and Laughter. This was one of the most insightful readings I read all class. She basically gave an overview with different specific insights to the history of women in comedy. Being a history major, this immediately sparked my interest. I was able to use her description of Marilyn Monroe’s comic genius in my final paper as well to show how far female comedy has come from.
My favorite selection was probably Tina Fey’s chapter in Bossypants titled, “All Girls Must Be Everything”. I thought this was such a powerful chapter because it both satirized, in a comic way, our sexist culture that objectifies women, but she also criticized this culture in a serious tone. She moved in and out of a serious and funny critique that made this both a really enjoyable and morally serious read. I will definitely be recommending this chapter to friends.
Not only have I learned a lot about feminism, but I hope I have become a better writer as well. I am not sure if I have ever written so much in a four week period of time. It was definitely a little stressful and high paced, but I think it challenged me as a writer, and hopefully helped me improve. Initially, I was a little skeptical of our writing textbook, but I gained many practical lessons from it that I had honestly never heard of.
All in all, I am extremely thankful I had the opportunity to take this class. Not only did I grow as a writer, but I think because of the subject matter, I grew as a person as well.
Chandler's Remix of Major Project
Do we live in a post-feminist society? Angela McRobbie defines this term by saying, “It understands post-feminism to refer to an active process by which feminist gains of the 1970s and 80s come to be undermined.” She expands, “It proposes that through an array of machinations, elements of contemporary popular culture are perniciously effective in regard to this undoing of feminism, while simultaneously appearing to be engaging in a well-informed and even well-intended response to feminism?”
Do shows like Parks and Recreation, who present women in an extremely feminist atmosphere distract us from the fact that we still live in a patriarchal society? I think that McRobbie would argue that these shows can definitely be counterproductive in the feminist movement because they might mislead the viewer into thinking that nothing else needs changed.
However, in reality, there are still so many systemic issues that need addressed and fixed.
Here in West Virginia there is still a backlog of rape test kits. http://www.endthebacklog.org/west-virginia
Like I argued in my paper, memoir’s like Amy Poehler's can be powerful and important in spreading feminist ideas, but only so long as they do not portray a world in which all feminist goals have already been achieved. There is still so much progress to be made, and it is important that we do not let how women are portrayed on TV or what celebrities say distract us from that.
Add caption |
"Writing About Writing"
Final Project Remix: Could You Be an Angry Feminist?
First things first, are you a woman?
If the answer is "no," then sorry, you can't be an angry Feminist. Good news though, you can still be a feminist! (Yes, men can be feminists too.) The bad news is: the preferred vernacular for you, especially among other men, would be "egalitarian." You can call yourself a feminist, but your credibility after that point will take a significant hit. If you go with the label of "egalitarian" then people will take you much more seriously because they don't know that "egalitarian" is just a fancy sounding word for believing in equal rights for everybody. What they really don't need to know is that "feminist" is just a
![]() |
Hmmm sounds so reasonable... |
![]() |
This sounds so familiar, but it's got the prefix "fem" in it: it must be an attack on men! |
Do you already consider yourself a feminist?
If your answer is yes:
Congratulations! You're an "angry feminist". The patriarch has already instilled the mythos of the "angry feminist" into a large portion of the population with which you will come into contact. The term "angry feminist" is an oppressive characterization of feminists which has been set into place by the patriarchy to discredit feminism and makes lots of people automatically assume you're an "angry feminist" if you speak up for things like equal pay, a woman's right to control what she does to her own body (or what she won't allow others to do to it), equal distribution of domestic chores between genders...woops, sorry, my angry feminism is showing. Let me just shove that back under the label of egalitarianism. Phew, that's better, huh?
If your answer is no:
Do you believe in equal rights for all people?
If the answer is yes:
Congratulations! You're a feminist! Shhh, it's okay. Don't fight it. You're a feminist. Just accept it.
If the answer is "no," I don't really know what to do with you. Why are you even still reading this?
Now my last and most important question for you is:
Are you a woman who is outspoken and/or fed up enough to start defending your and or other women's right to equality? Further, are you "brave" enough to defend these rights for all people regardless of their race or ethnicity, how much money they have, or who they choose to love?
If your answer is yes:
Oof, I don't know how to tell you this but you're a shameful angry feminist. You should probably calm down. Have you tried yoga?
If your answer is no: Are you lost? How did you end up reading this far? Finally and most importantly, have you time-traveled here from the 1950's? Or perhaps you're a British woman from the 17th century and your corset has cut off the oxygen flow to your brain so that you just can't seem to think straight. I'll excuse you if this is the case because you just don't know any better yet.
However, if you don't have a good excuse (and misogynistic reasons are not good excuses) for not believing in equal human rights for all humans, I really only have one thing to say to you: "Pull your fuckin socks up!" (Nanette).